Cases filed in Rhode Island
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00475
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00474
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00473
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wuotila v. Ryan et al
as 1:2009cv00620
Plaintiff: Mark Wuotila
Defendant: Thomas M. Ryan, Howard A. McLure, David B. Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commiss
Medoff v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00554
Plaintiff: Richard Medoff
Defendant: CVS Caremark Corporation, Thomas M. Ryan, David Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00522
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00186
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nash v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00079
Plaintiff: William Nash
Defendant: CVS Caremark Corporation and Holiday CVS LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00304
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Peraria et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2008cv00252
Plaintiff: Melissa Peraria and Crystal Bobero
Defendant: CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?