Cases 11 - 20 of 429
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
CHOMKA v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2023cv06512
Plaintiff:
CARLA CHOMKA
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Carla Aramouni v. ACELYRIN, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09672
Plaintiff:
Carla Aramouni
Defendant:
ACELYRIN, Inc., Shao-Lee Lin, Mardi C. Dier and others
Carla Ciuffo v. Christine Dagousset et al
as 2:2023cv09712
Plaintiff:
Carla Ciuffo
Defendant:
Olaplex Holdings, Inc., Christine Dagousset, Deirdre Findlay and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Marcos Vega v. City Loan Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2023cv07203
Plaintiff:
Marcos Vega, Heide Estrada, Carla Anguiano and others
Defendant:
City Loan Holdings LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, ComVest Capital II Partners UGP, LLC, ComVest Capital II Partners, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Raymond A. Green v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv06347
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Green
Defendant:
D. Samuel, A. Sanchez, S. Rizo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
