Cases 11 - 20 of 276
Casey v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2023cv16065
Plaintiff:
Kristi Casey
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Caseys' General Store, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03442
Plaintiff:
Shelley Miller
Defendant:
Caseys' General Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bertram v. SunRun Inc
as 2:2023cv02215
Plaintiff:
Casey Bertram
Defendant:
SunRun Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bertram v. ADT Solar LLC
as 2:2023cv02206
Plaintiff:
Casey Bertram
Defendant:
ADT Solar LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Casey v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08979
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Casey
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Casey v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08134
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Casey
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Casey v. Synchrony Bank
as 1:2023cv07949
Plaintiff:
Michael Casey
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. Leffler et al
as 4:2023cv04147
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan Leffler, J Johnson, Martin Matherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
