Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Chapman v. Redington
as 4:2023cv00455
Petitioner:
Marion M Chapman
Respondent:
Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel et al v. Southern Boone School District et al
as 2:2023cv04123
Plaintiff:
Tawnya Samuel and Michael Samuel
Defendant:
Southern Boone School District, The Board of Education of the Southern Boone School District, Justin Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chapman v. Redington
as 2:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Marion M. Chapman
Respondent:
Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Amber Chapman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chapman v. Redington
as 4:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Marion M Chapman
Respondent:
Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Brewer et al
as 2:2022cv04123
Plaintiff:
Marion M Chapman
Defendant:
Chris Brewer and Patrick William Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pate v. Chapman
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Cortez Pate
Defendant:
Michelle Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Perficient, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
David Chapman
Defendant:
Perficient, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Chapman et al v. GEICO Casualty Company
as 4:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Robert A Chapman, Jr. and Vincente A Chapman
Defendant:
GEICO Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Darden v. St. Louis Airport and City Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Dominique Darden
Defendant:
St. Louis Airport and City Dept., Lt. Unknown Thomas, Lt. Unknown Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
