Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Muhammad v. Department of the NAVY (USN) et al
as 1:2011cv01935
Plaintiff:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant:
Department of the NAVY (USN) and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. Burlington Coat Factory
as 11-400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
Burlington Coat Factory
Muhammad v. United States Postal Service
as 11-307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service, Newark Main Office Window Services, Sheila Hooper-Henry and others
Muhammad v. Burlington Coat Factory
as 1:2010cv09552
Plaintiff:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant:
Burlington Coat Factory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. United States Postal Service
as 10-5130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service, Newark Main Office Window Services, Sheila Hooper-Henry and others
Muhammad v. Capital One Bank
as 10-4877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
Capital One Bank and Experian Business Information Services
Muhammad v. Experian Business in Formation Services
as 1:2010cv05572
Plaintiff:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant:
Experian Business in Formation Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. Capital One Bank et al
as 1:2010cv05571
Plaintiff:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant:
Capital One Bank and Experian Business Information Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. Discovering Foreclosure Profit
as 10-2660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
Discovering Foreclosure Profits and Ann Goldschmidt
Muhammad v. United States Postal Service
as 10-2648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles IBN Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service, Newark Main Office Window Services, Sheila Hooper-Henry and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
