Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Cox v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03359
Plaintiff:
Larry Cox
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrance Olden v. Cherryle Hinthorne
as 23-3404
Petitioner:
TERRANCE OLDEN
Respondent:
CHERRYLE HINTHORNE, Warden
Hayden v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv01442
Petitioner:
Richard T Hayden
Respondent:
Latoya Hughes, Cherryl Hinthorne and Kwame Raoule
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, Shawn Thrush, Sterling Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Childs v. Kwame Raoul
as 23-3281
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN CHILDS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHERRYLE HINTHORNE, Warden and KWAME RAOUL
Alarcon v. Hinthorne
as 1:2023cv16237
Petitioner:
Modesto Alarcon
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman et al v. Dawson et al
as 1:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Freeman, Raynada Jones, Herbie McBride and others
Defendant:
James Dawson, Cherryle Hinthorne, Wexford Health Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craddock v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2023cv15908
Petitioner:
Jermaine Craddock
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayden v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03251
Petitioner:
Richard T Hayden
Respondent:
Latoya Hughes, Cherryle Hinthorne, Kwame Raoule and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Hinthorne
as 1:2023cv01319
Petitioner:
Keith Griffin
Respondent:
Cherryl Hinthorne
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
