Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Bey v. Clark County Child Support Division et al
as 2:2015cv01719
Plaintiff:
Shakur Assad Mansa Bey
Defendant:
Clark County Child Support Division and Steven B. Wolfson
In Re:
Jonathan David Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Fikrou v. Montgomery County Office of Child Support Enforcement Division et al
as 2:2015cv01297
Plaintiff:
Guetatchew Fikrou
Defendant:
E. Harkleroad, Debbie Hinds, Christopher J. Kunz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Welch v. State Of Nevada et al
as 2:2011cv02111
Defendant:
District Attorney for Child Support, Gail Hewlett, State Of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Welch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mathis v. San Francisco Child Support Services et al
as 3:2010cv00390
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Department of Health, San Francisco Child Support Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hughes v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services Division of Child Support (D CS)
as 3:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Hughes
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services Division of Child Support (D CS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ignacio v. Judges of United District Court (Reno) et al
as 3:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
Tevis Ignacio
Defendant:
Judges of United District Court (Reno), Department of Child Support Services, Wells Fargo Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ignacio v. California Department of Child Support Services et al
as 3:2007cv00497
Plaintiff:
Tevis Ignacio
Defendant:
California Department of Child Support Services, Wells Fargo Bank and Family Law Division of Santa Clara County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
