Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Christy v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv04220
Petitioner:
Kevin L Christy
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Ruiz v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01785
Plaintiff:
Christie Ruiz
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Krivanek v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01711
Plaintiff:
Christy Krivanek
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rover Pipeline LLC et al v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al
as 5:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC and Energy Transfer LP
Defendant:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Chairman Richard Glick, Commissioner James Danly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justice v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2021cv05903
Plaintiff:
Lotus Justice
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Attorney General, State of Ohio, Bureau of Criminal Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
