Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatfield v. Circle K Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00082
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alberta Hatfield and Ray Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelton v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sara Shelton
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holmes -v- Coleman
as 2:2013cv02798
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee; , Issac Coleman, Memphis Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Misty Alexandria Holmes
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamara Batts v. Circle K Stores Inc.
as 2:2013cv02083
Plaintiff:
Tamara Batts
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Love et al v. Circle K Stores Inc.
as 2:2012cv02538
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Orville Love and Cathey Faye Love
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love v. Circle K Stores Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02537
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc. and cathey faye love
Plaintiff:
David Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Batts v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02908
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tamara Batts
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McVay v. Circle K Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02013
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Plaintiff:
Bob McVay
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc., Circle K Stores, Inc., BP Products North America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
Bryan et al v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 2:2007cv02351
Plaintiff:
Dollie Ezell Bryan and David Bryan
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc., Circle K Stores, Inc. and Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
