Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Phillips v. Whitfield et al
as 4:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
William Phillips
Defendant:
Michael Whitfield , Clarksdale Police Department , City of Clarksdale, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
K.L. v. City of Clarksdale, Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Donnica K.L.
Defendant:
City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, Clarksdale Police Department, Greg Hoskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Walsh et al
as 4:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lofton
Defendant:
Nicholas Walsh and City of Clarksdale, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. County of Coahoma County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Marco D. Stewart
Defendant:
County of Coahoma County, Mississippi , City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, John Rybolt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00059
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hines v. City of Clarksdale et al
as 4:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Elbert Hines, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Clarksdale , William Whit Read , Jason Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Skipper v. City of Clarksdale, Mississippi et al
as 2:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Queston Skipper
Defendant:
City of Clarksdale, Mississippi , Milton Williams, Jr. , Carl Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
