Cases 11 - 20 of 78
DuPuis v. City of Highland Park et al
as 2:2021cv11034
Defendant:
City of Highland Park and Hubert Yopp
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jay DuPuis, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Highland Park v. Menge
as 2:2021cv10528
Defendant:
Brian Menge
Plaintiff:
City of Highland Park
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
City of Highland Park, MI v. EPA, et al
as 21-1173
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN MCCORMICK and GREAT LAKES WATER AUTHORITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, MI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Highland Park v. Menge
as 2:2021cv10527
Defendant:
Brian Menge
Plaintiff:
City of Highland Park
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Bartynski v. City of Highland Park, Michigan
as 2:2021cv10049
Defendant:
City of Highland Park, Michigan
Plaintiff:
Keath B Bartynski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bartynski v. City of Highland Park
as 2:2021cv10048
Defendant:
City of Highland Park
Plaintiff:
Keath B Bartynski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Veretta Burnett v. Jeffrey Rosen, et al
as 20-2158
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW J. SCHNEIDER, DANNA NESSEL, Attorney General for Wayne County MI, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Headquarters, Chris Hess-7, David Harmon, Gwen Rosenthal and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERETTA BURNETT
Michael Niewolak v. City of Highland Park, MI, et al
as 20-1958
Defendant / Appellant:
LIEUTENANT EDWARDS and SERGEANT HEATHER HOLCOMB
Defendant:
SERGEANT KEATH BARTYNSKI and CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, MI
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL NIEWOLAK
Peter Hudson v. City of Highland Park, MI, et al
as 20-1798
Defendant:
MAKINI JACKSON, THE LEONA GROUP, LLC, CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, MI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DEREK HILLMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
