Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Tara v. Officer Brent Frank et al
as 2:2016cv00148
Plaintiff:
Linson Tara
Defendant:
Officer Brent Frank , Officer Mike Boehmer and City of Tukwila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glimberg et al v. City of Auburn et al
as 2:2015cv01282
Defendant:
City of Auburn , City of Federal Way , City of Kent and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Glimberg and Sarah Glimberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jahmez Amili, II, et al v. City of Tukwila, et al
as 14-35663
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAHMEZ A. AMILI, II and CHARLES A. CHAPPELLE, II
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF TUKWILA, MICHAEL VILLA, ZACHARY B. ANDERSON and others
Mills, et al v. City of Tukwila, et al
as 2:2014cv00929
Plaintiff:
Deann R Mills and Victor Duffy, Sr
Defendant:
City of Tukwila , P Hisa , J Vivet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Hogan et al
as 2:2014cv00675
Plaintiff:
Robert Turner
Defendant:
Nicholas Hogan , John Doe , David Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Struckman v. City of Tukwila et al
as 2:2014cv00547
Plaintiff:
Walter G.E. Struckman
Defendant:
City of Tukwila , Jamie Sturgill, Jane Doe Sturgill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv00537
Plaintiff:
Walter G.E. Struckman, City of Tukwila, Washington, Jamie Sturgill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lott v. Anderson et al
as 2:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
David Lott
Defendant:
Zack Anderson , Jacob Berry and City of Tukwila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC Data Services Sales Tax Refund Litigation
as 2:2013md02485
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
City of Renton Washington , City of Tukwila, Washington , City of Kent, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Hogan et al
as 2:2013cv01419
Plaintiff:
Alvin Walker
Defendant:
Nicholas Hogan , Jacob Berry and City of Tukwila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
