Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03036
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
In re: Clayton Sheldon Creek
as 16-2702
Petitioner: In re: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Creek v. S.D. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2016cv04063
Petitioner: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Respondent: S.D. Board of Pardons and Paroles and Marty J. Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clayton Creek v. Dennis Daugaard, et al
as 16-1920
Plaintiff - Appellant: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Defendant - Appellee: Dennis Daugaard, Governor of South Dakota, in his individual and official capacity, Dennis Kaemingk, Secretary of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity, Robert Dooley, Chief Warden, South Dakota D.O.C., in his individual and official capacity and others
Creek v. Daugarrd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv03001
Plaintiff: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Defendant: Dennis Daugaard, Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton Creek v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 15-3274
Petitioner - Appellant: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Respondent - Appellee: Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Creek v. Dooley et al
as 4:2015cv04144
Petitioner: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Respondent: Robert B. Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clayton Creek v. Robert Dooley
as 15-2345
Petitioner: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Respondent: Robert Dooley, Chief Warden, South Dakota Department of Corrections
In re: Clayton Sheldon Creek
as 15-1709
Petitioner: In re: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Clayton Sheldon Creek v. Robert Dooley
as 14-3629
Petitioner - Appellant: Clayton Sheldon Creek
Respondent - Appellee: Robert Dooley

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?