Cases 11 - 20 of 213
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cooks v. Cortez et al
as 1:2024cv03937
Defendant:
Sheri Cortez and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Foster v. City of Chicago Police et al
as 1:2024cv02920
Plaintiff:
Cortez Foster
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police, Calvin Blunt, Jeffrey Hanssen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03264
Plaintiff:
Lolita Cortez
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cortez v. Little Achievers Learning Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
Evilin L Cortez
Defendant:
Little Achievers Learning Center, Inc. and Sharla G. Thompson
Talidis v. IDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
James B Talidis
Defendant:
IDOC, Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Crowe
as 1:2024cv01089
Petitioner:
Cortez D Williams
Respondent:
Crystal Crowe
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv15252
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Kernel, Tom J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Yoksoulian et al
as 1:2023cv08824
Plaintiff:
Thadieus D. Goods
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Yoksoulian, Sgt. Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
