Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Barksdale v. Crawley
as 6:2017cv06537
Petitioner:
Jovan Barksdale
Respondent:
Karen Crawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawley-Mack et al v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04622
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Crawley-Mack and Keith Mack
Defendant:
John Doe, Rite Aid of New York, Inc., United Healthcare of New York, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Crawley v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Kent Derrick Crawley
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Salim v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2015cv08521
Plaintiff:
Said Salim
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Adam Ramos, Wilbert Crawley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pruter v. Local 210's Pension Trust Fund et al
as 1:2015cv01153
Plaintiff:
Janet Pruter , Raymond Marques , John Artates and others
Defendant:
Local 210's Pension Trust Fund and Local 210, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Carter v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv10187
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Carter
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Emerson Charles, Matthew Crawley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawley v. Colvin
as 6:2013cv06242
Plaintiff:
Shakira Crawley
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02611
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04736
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
