Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Cawley-Bruso et al v. Ray Klein Inc
as 2:2019cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael Bruso and Shara Cawley-Bruso
Defendant:
Ray Klein, Inc. dba Professional Credit Service
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Archer v. Associated Credit Service Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Charles Archer
Defendant:
Associated Credit Service Inc, David Solberg, Jane Doe Solberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Torres, et al
as 1:2017cv03217
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Elsa Leticia Torres and Northwest Farm Credit Services PCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Fuqua v. Associated Credit Service Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
Jessica Fuqua
Defendant:
Associated Credit Service Inc, Paul J Wasson and Jane Doe Wasson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sullivan v. Financial Credit Service, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
Jill Sullivan
Defendant:
Financial Credit Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brandt v. Columbia Credit Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00703
Plaintiff:
Russell Brandt
Defendant:
Columbia Credit Services, Inc., Wales & Woehler, Inc., P.S., Jason L. Woehler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seed v. Associated Credit Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bradley Seed
Defendant:
Associated Credit Service Inc, Paul J Wasson and Jane Doe Wasson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Harper et ux v. Credit Service of Central Washington, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00341
Plaintiff:
Michael Harper and Jessica Harper
Defendant:
Credit Service of Central Washington Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
