Cases 11 - 19 of 19
In Re Netflix, Inc., Securities Litigation
as 3:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Royal Oak Retirement System , Duane Labbee , Frank J. Fish and others
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc. , Reed Hastings , David B. Wells and others
Movant:
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund , Alaska Electrical Pension Fund and Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States of America v. Richard D. Hunt
as 2:2011cv08845
Defendant:
Richard D Hunt
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Incl et al v. IMPAX Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv05467
Plaintiff:
Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc , Amy F.T, Arnsten , Pasko Rakic and others
Defendant:
IMPAX Laboratories, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.-Florida, Watson Pharma, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
United States of America v. Richard D. Hunt
as 2:2010cv04772
Defendant:
Richard D Hunt
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Virginia Harpster v. D. Hunt Ramsbottom et al
as 2:2010cv01006
Defendant:
Michael S. Burke, Dan J. Cohrs, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Harpster
John Cobb v. D. Hunt Ramsbottom et al
as 2:2010cv00485
Defendant:
Michael S. Burke, Dan J. Cohrs, Merrick I. Kerr and others
Plaintiff:
John Cobb and Virginia Harpster
Hunt v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02838
Plaintiff:
Zackery D. Hunt
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, J Fitzgerald and M. Brown
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hunt v. The Board of Prison Terms et al
as 5:2008cv03591
Petitioner:
Zackery D. Hunt
Respondent:
The Board of Prison Terms and T. Roberson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hunt v. Wolpoff & Abramson LLP
as 2:2007cv02606
Plaintiff:
John D Hunt
Defendant:
Wolpoff & Abramson LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
