Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
JARKA et al v. HOLLAND et al
as 3:2013cv01912
Plaintiff:
STANLEY JARKA , CRYSTAL JARKA , SHINA DE SHONG and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM HOLLAND and D.M. BOWMAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MAGANINHO et al
as 2:2012cv02115
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MARIA MAGANINHO, C.M. and D.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
MIDAS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and MIDAS REALTY CORPORATION v. D.M. SAMUELS, INC.
as 2:2011mc00101
Plaintiff:
MIDAS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and MIDAS REALTY CORPORATION
Defendant:
D.M. SAMUELS, INC.
FIERMAN PRODUCE EXCHANGE, INC. AND D.M. ROTHMAN CO., INC. v. GARDEN FRESH PRODUCE, INC. AND JOSEPH GUARASINO
as 2:2010mc00174
Plaintiff:
FIERMAN PRODUCE EXCHANGE, INC. AND D.M. ROTHMAN CO., INC.
Defendant:
GARDEN FRESH PRODUCE, INC. AND JOSEPH GUARASINO
J.M. et al v. WAYNE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2010cv03934
Plaintiff:
J.M. and D.M.
Defendant:
WAYNE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
R.M. et al v. TOTOWA BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2009cv02566
Plaintiff:
R.M., J.P.M., J.M. and others
Defendant:
TOTOWA BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION v. D.M. AND S.M.
as 3:2009cv01359
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
D.M. AND S.M.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
