Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Sadowski v. D.R. Horton Realty of Georgia, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00995
Defendant:
D.R. Horton Realty of Georgia, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Snowden et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2018cv01797
Defendant:
D.R. Horton-Texas, Ltd., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ascencio and Michael Cary Snowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stross v. D.R. Kidd Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00109
Defendant:
D.R. Kidd Company, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Accident Insurance Company, Inc. v. McKee et al
as 4:2017cv01286
Plaintiff:
Accident Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Caitlin McKee, D.R. Horton-Texas, Ltd. and Pedro Velazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NVR, Inc. v. Davern et al
as 4:2016mc00010
Plaintiff:
NVR, Inc.
Defendant:
Jonathan Davern
Respondent:
D.R. Horton Inc and George Seagraves
Evanston Insurance Company v. Chandler Innovations, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00107
Defendant:
CHTex of Texas, Inc., Chandler Innovations, LLC, Continental Homes of Texas, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Kitt v. Bailey et al
as 4:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
Leonard Wayne Kitt
Defendant:
T.H. Bailey, J Vincient, D.R. McMurry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King Ranch, Inc. et al v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
King Ranch, Inc. and King Ranch IP LLC
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
