Cases 11 - 20 of 5,120
Barnes v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04522
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, John Doe 1, Susan Shobol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Jail/D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv04517
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Jail/D.O.C., Deputy Manzella, Response Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Sheriff's Record Dept et al
as 1:2024cv04529
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Record Dept, H Sorte, Kiuilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04199
Plaintiff:
Pierre Lamar Garrett
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Pollock and Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04172
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Amador, Kehoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03795
Petitioner:
Lawrence Whitfield
Respondent:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bogan v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03799
Plaintiff:
Leah Bogan
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03741
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Brinson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rogers v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03739
Plaintiff:
Kavarian Rogers
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hicks v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Yarnell Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and CCDOC Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
