Cases 11 - 20 of 139
Lozano et al v. Lisinski et al
as 2:2022oe03088
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Lozano, Giulia Fantacci and Lauren Eagan
Defendant:
Angelyne Lisinski, JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 10, Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Campbell v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
William Campbell
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Hamilton County Board Of Commissioners, Brian Shepherd (#23) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Neack v. UC Health, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Neack
Defendant:
UC Health, LLC doing business as UC Health, UC Health Retirement Plan and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
v. Neack et al
as 1:2022oe00066
Defendant:
Lawrence E. Neack, UC Health, LLC, UC Health Retirement Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
v. Neack et al
as 1:2022cv00066
Defendant:
Lawrence E. Neack, UC Health, LLC, UC Health Retirement Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Neack v. UC Health, LLC et al
as 1:2022oe00065
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Neack
Defendant:
UC Health, LLC, UC Health Retirement Plan and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Neack v. UC Health, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Neack
Defendant:
UC Health, LLC, UC Health Retirement Plan and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Camden v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03878
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 inclusive, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Access Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy Camden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sizemore v. Edgewood Board of Education et al
as 1:2019cv00555
Defendant:
Tom York, Edgewood City Schools, Edgewood Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
