Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Jed Welker v. John Baldwin, et al
as 17-2617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JED M. WELKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN BALDWIN, JOHN DOE, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ and others
Jackson v. Stolworthy et al
as 3:2017cv00420
Plaintiff:
Stevie Jackson
Defendant:
Donald Stolworthy, Mueller, Donald Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medrano v. Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01157
Plaintiff:
Jose Medrano
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, John Baldwin, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Akpore et al
as 4:2017cv04100
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lofton
Defendant:
Kevwe Akpore, Donald Stolworthy, Brian D. Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz et al v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz, Jesse R. Perez, Marcus A. Barry and others
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Merritte v. Michael Lemke, et al
as 17-1636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN L. MERRITTE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LEMKE, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED and others
Parisi v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00444
Plaintiff:
Paul Matthew Parisi
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., A. Martija, A. Hundley-Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv01013
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, SA Godinez, . Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Merritte v. Michael Lemke, et al
as 17-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN L. MERRITTE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LEMKE, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED and others
Strong v. IDOC et al
as 3:2016cv01357
Plaintiff:
Darius Strong
Defendant:
IDOC, S. A. Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
