Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Arturo Bahena v. Warden Dwight Fondren
as 09-2108
Petitioner - Appellant:
Arturo Bahena
Respondent - Appellee:
Warden Dwight L. Fondren, (Sandstone)
Jermaine Ford v. Dwight L. Fondren
as 09-2055
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jermaine Ford
Respondent - Appellee:
Dwight L. Fondren, Warden
Smith v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00764
Petitioner:
Derrick Bruce Smith
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lucientes v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00760
Petitioner:
Richard B. Lucientes
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren and Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lamont Gentry Falls v. Dwight L. Fondren
as 09-1259
Petitioner - Appellant:
Lamont Gentry Falls
Respondent - Appellee:
Dwight L. Fondren, Warden
Falls v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00049
Petitioner:
Lamont G. Falls
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Muth v. Fondren
as 0:2008cv06513
Petitioner:
Seth Muth
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren and Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shawn Simmons v. Dwight Fondren, etc.
as 08-3901
Petitioner - Appellant:
Shawn Simmons
Respondent - Appellee:
Dwight L. Fondren, Warden
Rudolph Stanko v. Warden Dwight Fondren, etc., et al
as 08-3738
Petitioner - Appellant:
Rudolph George Stanko, individually and on behalf of prisoners who were, are or will be imprisoned at the Sandstone Federal Prison
Respondent - Appellee:
Warden Dwight L. Fondren, Local Director, Michael K. Nalley, Regional Director and Harley Lappin, Central Director
Willie Joe Johnson v. Dwight L. Fondren, et al
as 08-3656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Willie Joe Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Dwight L. Fondren, Warden, Cpt. Pummill, J. Jarvis, Unit Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
