Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv06143
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv05657
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Francisco Martinez Franco v. David Jennings, et al
as 21-16087
Respondent: IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DAVID W. JENNINGS, CHAD F. WOLF and others
Petitioner: FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ FRANCO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04737
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04569
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv04136
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02941
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02608
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02605
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Nectali Romero Romero v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-15565
Respondent: TAE JOHNSON, Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JANESE MULL, Assistant Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID W. JENNINGS, Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: NECTALI ULISES ROMERO ROMERO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?