Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Marc Harris v. Dean Meiling, et al
as 20-16931
Defendant / Appellant:
DSM PARTNERS, LP, a Nevada Limited Partnership, DSM P GP LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, MADYLON MEILING, an individual and others
Defendant:
MEILING FAMILY PARTNERS, LTD., KAEMPFER CROWELL, LTD, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARC HARRIS, an individual on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Susan Baker et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 3:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Suite B LLC, DSM P GP LLC, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Kless, Carolyn Noyes, Dorothy D. Shelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jerry Alexander, et al v. Dean Meiling, et al
as 20-16688
Defendant / Appellee:
METALAST SURFACE TECHNOLOGY LLC, JANET CHUBB, DEAN MEILING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RON SMITH, ANDREW TANNER, MARC HARRIS and others
Defendant:
MERIDIAN ADVANTAGE and JAMES PROCTOR
Susan Baker et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 2:2020cv04335
Plaintiff:
Leonard A. Semas, Jim Kless, Ed Quintal and others
Defendant:
Does 1-100, inclusive, DSM P GP LLC, Janet Chubb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marc Harris v. Dean Meiling et al
as 3:2019cv00339
Defendant:
Suite B LLC, Does 1-100, inclusive, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marc Harris v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2019cv00595
Defendant:
DSM Partners, LP, Chemeon Surface Technology, LLC, DSM P GP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alexander et al v. Meiling et al
as 3:2016cv00572
702) 314-1210 (fax:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Chemeon Surface Technology LLC, Janet Chubb, D&M-MI, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elias Kassouf, Jerry McDonald, Ron Melanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
