Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Nichols v. Kennedy, et al
as 1:2019cv01231
Respondent:
Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois, Director I.D.O.C., Pontiac Correctional Center and others
Petitioner:
Demetrius H Nichols
Defendant:
Terry L Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nichols v. Kennedy
as 1:2019cv01024
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Demetrius H Nichols
Respondent:
Teri Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nichols v. People of the State of Illinois
as 1:2018cv01248
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Demetrius H Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nichols v. Devine
as 1:2010cv00307
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H Nichols
Defendant:
Rchard A Devine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. People of the State of Illinois
as 1:2009cv06328
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H Nichols
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01300
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H. Nichols, Sr.
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Attorney General Illinois
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nichols v. State of Illinois
as 1:2007cv06821
Petitioner:
Demetrius H Nichols
Respondent:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Director, Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv03498
Petitioner:
Demetrius H Nichols
Respondent:
Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv02831
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H Nichols
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Governor State of Illinois and Ford Heights Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
