Cases 11 - 20 of 22
DURR v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00354
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DURR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRIS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2020cv02737
Plaintiff:
JACK K. NORRIS, III
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MATTWAOSHSHE et al v. NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01317
Plaintiff:
JEREMY MATTWAOSHSHE and JUSTIN STALLBAUMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, NEXTERA ENERGY INC, NEXTERA ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY et al
as 1:2019cv02188
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES CIA INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COORDINATOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
DURR v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
as 1:2019cv01340
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DURR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
FEDERAL PRACTICE GROUP v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
as 1:2019cv00031
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Plaintiff:
The Federal Practice Group and FEDERAL PRACTICE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PARKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2018cv00748
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MONROE PARKER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SINGH et al v. MCCONVILLE et al
as 1:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
KANWAR BIR SINGH , HARPAL SINGH and SATWINDER SINGH
Defendant:
JAMES C. MCCONVILLE , DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , ASHTON B. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RANA v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
as 1:2015cv00957
Plaintiff:
GENE S. RANA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006
HOLMES et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CENTRAL COMMAND et al
as 1:2011cv01283
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOLMES and LAURAL LEVINE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CENTRAL COMMAND and DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
