Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Thares v. So. Dak. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv04107
Defendant:
Catherine Schlimgen, Mike Leidholt, B. Mudder and others
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Thares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harcey v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2021cv04071
Defendant:
Myron Rau, Kenneth Albers, Chuck Schroyer and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Harcey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. South Dakota Department of Corrections
as 4:2020cv04161
Plaintiff:
Nick Hines and Nicholas Stewart Hines
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. South Dakota Department of Corrections
as 4:2020cv04162
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wurtz v. South Dakota Department of Corrections
as 4:2020cv04160
Plaintiff:
James Wurtz
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littles v. South Dakota Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv04144
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections, Department of Health, SD Human Services Center and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Levon Littles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowherd v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2020cv04126
Defendant:
Cpl Rodriguez, SCO Craig, Mike Leidholt and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Cowherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. Cook et al
as 4:2020cv04021
Defendant:
Jennifer Driski, Kyle Bender, Eugiene Regier and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creek v. Weber et al
as 4:2019cv04205
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Mental Health, Douglas Weber, Dennis Kaemingk and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton Sheldon Creek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hodge v. Fluke et al
as 4:2019cv04189
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hodge
Defendant:
Lt. Lucero, Mr. Loewe, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
