Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Michael Brousil v. LABR
as 21-1532
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. BROUSIL
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3282
Petitioner: WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P.
Respondent: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Estate of Daniel A. Ayres v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3017
Petitioner: ESTATE OF DANIEL A. AYRES, by Kimberly Ayres, Administrator
Respondent: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 20-4342
Petitioner: WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P.
Respondent: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
John Sparre v. LABR, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-2348
Petitioner: JOHN E. SPARRE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Intervening Respondent: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Crisell Seguin v. US Department of Labor We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1414
Petitioner: CRISELL SEGUIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD and NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Crisell Seguin v. US Department of Labor
as 17-2259
Petitioner: CRISELL SEGUIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, representing the United States Secretary of Labor, the Honorable Alexander Acosta
:
Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. v. US Department of Labor
as 17-2204
Petitioner: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
:
Claudio Occhione v. US Department of Labor
as 17-2143
Petitioner: CLAUDIO OCCHIONE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Jacek Samson v. LABR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2862
Petitioner: JACEK SAMSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?