Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Seneca Re-Ad Indust, Inc. v. Sec of the DOL, et al
as 24-3191
Plaintiff:
SENECA RE-AD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
ACTING SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Julie A. Su and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Intervenor:
RALPH MAGERS, PAMELA STEWARD and MARK FELTON
Thomas May v. LABR
as 23-3152
Petitioner:
THOMAS R. MAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
MAY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
as 1:2023cv02038
Petitioner:
THOMAS R. MAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shannon Gladden v. U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Review Boa
as 23-12133
Petitioner:
SHANNON GLADDEN
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Madhuri Trivedi v. LABR
as 23-1265
Petitioner:
MADHURI TRIVEDI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Jerome Yelder v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3857
Petitioner:
JEROME YELDER
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Broadgate, Inc. v. Walsh et al
as 2:2021cv12093
Plaintiff:
Broadgate, Inc.
Defendant:
Marty Walsh, Jessica Looman and Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Greatwide Dedicated Transport II, LLC v. United States Department of Labor
as 21-1797
Petitioner:
GREATWIDE DEDICATED TRANSPORT II, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD and THEODORE HUANG
Norfolk Southern Railway Co v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3369
Petitioner:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Intervenor:
SCOTTY LANCASTER
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS
Michael Brousil v. LABR
as 21-1532
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. BROUSIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
