Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Lapan et al v. Dicks Sporting Goods, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv11390
Plaintiff: Cheryl Lapan , Michelle Shutt and Vicky Montanez
Defendant: Dicks Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Musto v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11374
Plaintiff: Gabriella Musto
Defendant: Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv40069
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Performance Solutions, LLC v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 1:2011cv10700
Plaintiff: Performance Solutions, LLC
Defendant: Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10272
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lenahan et al v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv11832
Defendant: Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. , Galyan's Trading Company, Inc. , Edward Stack and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Lenahan and Heather Skutnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matthews v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv30087
Plaintiff: Michael Matthews and Morgan Matthews
Defendant: Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., Under Armour, Inc. and Under Armour Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv30223
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Divot Golf Corporati, et al v. Citizens Bank, et al
as 1:2002cv10654
Plaintiff: Divot Golf Corporation and Joseph R. Cellura
Defendant: Miller Golf Incorporated, Citizens Bank, Citizens Capital Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?