Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Shin et al v. Infinity Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv01954
Plaintiff:
Dong Gun Shin , Mi Ryung Shin and Yu Kyung Shin
Defendant:
Infinity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zuffa, LLC v. Lee et al
as 1:2017cv02133
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
Jin Dong Lee, Susan Kim and Lucky Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Long v. Wright
as 5:2017cv00050
Petitioner:
Dong Yu Long
Respondent:
Nicole D. Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vickers v. Raissi et al
as 1:2017cv00676
Defendant:
Raissi, David Raissi, Brian Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Vickers and Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vickers v. Dong et al
as 1:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Defendant:
Craig E. Dong, West Cobb Diner, Publix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BCD Restaurants, Inc. et al v. Book Chang Dong Tofu House
as 1:2015cv02862
Plaintiff:
BCD Restaurants, Inc. and Hee Sook Lee
Defendant:
Book Chang Dong Tofu House
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
United States of America v. Approximately 8,671,456,050 in Iraqi Dinars et al
as 1:2015cv02677
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately 8,671,456,050 in Iraqi Dinars, Approximately 13,317,698,200 in Vietnamese Dongs, Approximately 2,100 in Afghanis and others
Movant:
Leonard Heatherly
Claimant:
Otto May, Jr. and Arthur Mathis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Vickers v. Dong et al
as 1:2015cv02469
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Defendant:
Craig E. Dong, J. J. Tumlin, Anthoney J. Polizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yi v. Drew et al
as 1:2014cv03195
Plaintiff:
Dong Seok Yi
Defendant:
D. Drew, D. D. Tolliver, Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yi v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv02648
Petitioner:
Dong Seok Yi
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
