Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Witherall v. Bell et al
as 4:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Allen Witherall
Defendant:
Darrell Bell, Uknown USMS Auditors One and Two, Unknown Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshals One and Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schoen v. Bell et al
as 4:2017cv00039
Defendant:
Darrell Bell, Uknown USMS Auditors One and Two, Unknown Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshals One and Two and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schoen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quigg et al v. Bell et al
as 4:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Quigg
Defendant:
Darrell Bell, Uknown USMS Auditors One and Two, Unknown Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshals One and Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenfield v. Fender et al
as 4:2016cv00119
Petitioner:
Kal Kenfield
Respondent:
Douglas Fender and Timothy Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Fox et al
as 9:2016cv00144
Petitioner:
Larry Dewayne Adams
Respondent:
Timothy Fox and Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Busby et al
as 4:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wright
Defendant:
A. Busby, Duane Stewart, Douglas Fender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Fender et al
as 6:2016cv00084
Petitioner:
D'Wayne Bailey
Respondent:
Douglas Fender, Attorney General of the State of Montana, Steve Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Canda v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Edward Canda
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Montana Department of Corrections, David Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Fender et al
as 6:2016cv00037
Petitioner:
Dean Reeves
Respondent:
Douglas Fender and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heavygun v. Fender et al
as 4:2016cv00035
Petitioner:
Gary Duane Heavygun
Respondent:
Douglas Fender and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
