Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Gaither v. Beam Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jeff Gaither
Defendant:
Beam Partners, LLC , Terry S. Shilling , Janie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00817
Plaintiff:
Belinda M. Mitchell
Defendant:
Trudy E. Smith and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Blue Grass Provision Company, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Smith
Defendant:
Blue Grass Provision Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Butler
as 6:2014cv00165
Respondent:
Sandra Butler
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rickett v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Rickett
Defendant:
Donald E. Smith and Phoenix Synergies, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Adams et al v. Sapphire Mining, Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Carlos J. Adams , Donald Adams , Lennie Gale Adams and others
Defendant:
Sapphire Coal Company , United Coal Company, LLC , Unknown Agents of Sapphire Mining, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Smith et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 0:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jimmy T. Smith and Hollie E. Smith
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Univar USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Smith , Deloris Smith , James Pingleton and others
Defendant:
Univar USA, Inc. , PPG Industries, Inc. , The Dow Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Akers
as 5:2012cv00059
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00129
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
