Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lim v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv11482
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lim
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre, Pauline D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Schreiber v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv12151
Plaintiff:
Moshe Schreiber
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Eduardo Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Ahmad v. Novak et al
as 1:2007cv11943
Plaintiff:
Zaish Ahmad
Defendant:
Paul Novak, Denis Riordan, Eduardo Aguirre, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Amri Aziz v. Chadbourne et al
as 1:2007cv11806
Plaintiff:
Said Amri Aziz
Defendant:
Bruce Chadbourne, Denis Riordan, Eduardo Aguirre, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mironchikova et al v. Keisler et al
as 1:2007cv11726
Plaintiff:
Tamara Mironchikova, Andrey Vladdimirovic Spichkin and Dmitriy Andreevich Spichkin
Defendant:
Peter D Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joumma v. Chadbourne et al
as 1:2007cv11607
Plaintiff:
Dani Lahoud Joumma
Defendant:
Bruce Chadbourne, Denis Riordan, Eduardo Aguirre, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
