Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor and DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT, individually, and in his official capacity as an employee of MDHHS
LONG et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv12153
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA LONG and CHERIE LINK
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Leo A. Daly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor and DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NANCY PEELER, individually, and in her official capacity as an employee of the MDHHS
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1745
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor and DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LIANE SHECKTER-SMITH, individually, and in her official capacity as Chief of the Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance for MDEQ, DANIEL WYANT, individually, and in his official capacity as Director of MDEQ, STEPHEN BUSCH, individually, and in his official capacity as District Supervisor for MDEQ and others
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1698
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor and DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDEN WELLS, individually, and in her capacity as Chief Medical Executive for MDHHS and NICK LYON, individually, and in his capacity as Director of MDHHS
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1699
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor and DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually, and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF FLINT, MI, a Michigan municipal corporation, HOWARD CROFT, individually, and in his official capacity as Flint's Director of Public Works, MICHAEL GLASGOW, individually, and in his official capacity as an employee of the City of Flint and others
Gaddy et al v. Flint et al
as 4:2017cv11166
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gaddy , K.G.1 , K.G.2 and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamara Nappier v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 17-1401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TAMARA NAPPIER, as mother and next friend of Takarie Nappier, a minor child, on behalf of Takarie Nappier and a class of all others similarly situated, Takarie Nappier
Defendant:
RICHARD SNYDER, DARNELL EARLEY, GERALD AMBROSE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL WYANT, LIANE SHEKTER SMITH, STEPHEN BUSCH and others
WILSON et al v. City of Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10743
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILSON , T.W.1 , T.W.2 and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Howard Croft, Michael Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SUMMERS et al v. City of Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10745
Plaintiff:
TANISHA SUMMERS , D.S. , T.M.1 and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Howard Croft, Michael Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
