Cases 11 - 20 of 205
Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Greg Holdren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Antonio Taylor
Defendant:
Ron Erdos, Leslie Mahlman, Lauder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
De'Amontae Manning
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Linnea Mahlman, Siney Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Robert Bates
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Annette Chambers-Smith, Ron Erdos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. Erdos
as 1:2022cv00848
Petitioner:
Jamal Dye
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLING ERROR
as 1:2022cv00845
Petitioner:
Jamal Dye
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Mahlman et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Michael DeAndre Brown
Defendant:
Linnea Mahlman, James Whitman, Roger Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermeal White v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 22-3350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMEAL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden, CYNTHIA DAVIS, Unit Manager Chief, JUSTIN DEERFIELD and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Glenn v. Basham et al
as 2:2022cv01904
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Glenn
Defendant:
C/o Basham, C/o McCoy and Warden Erdos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
