Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Lawrence Fauntleroy v. L. Jacobs
as 20-13081
Defendant / Appellee:
L. JACOBS, Medical Director of Facility, Dekalb County Jail
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE FAUNTLEROY
Lawrence Fauntleroy v. Kenneth S. Nugent, P.C., et al
as 20-13072
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW C. RICHARDSON, Attorney and KENNETH S. NUGENT, P.C., Attorneys at Law
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE FAUNTLEROY
Fauntleroy v. NYC Two Detectives
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2020cv06419
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fauntleroy
Defendant:
NYC Two Detectives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fauntleroy v. NYC Two Detectives
as 1:2020cv03063
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fauntleroy
Defendant:
NYC Two Detectives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAUNTLEROY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13624
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CANDICE FAUNTLEROY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fauntleroy v. Lyft Driver et al
as 1:2020cv02269
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Lyft Driver
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fauntleroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fauntleroy v. Lyft
as 1:2020cv02270
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fauntleroy
Defendant:
Lyft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fauntleroy v. DeKalb County Jail
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2020cv02254
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fauntleroy
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.