Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Cornell v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
Clinton J. Cornell
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Faucett v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Michael Faucett
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mobley v. FCI Memphis Warden et al
as 5:2022cv00285
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
FCI Memphis Warden and United States of America Wardens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howard v. Warden of FCI Manchester
as 6:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Laron Howard
Defendant:
Warden of FCI Manchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ferranti v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2022cv00049
Petitioner:
Jack Ferranti
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Myers v. FCI Ashland et al
as 0:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Reginald Myers
Defendant:
FCI Ashland, Mr. LeMaster and Mr. Issacs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Ray et al
as 6:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jamar D. Green
Defendant:
H.L. Ray, FCI Manchester and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Daniels v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gandy v. Boyd et al
as 0:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Gandy
Defendant:
P.A. Boyd, Medical Director of Ashland FCI and Director of Psychology
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Warden, FCI Manchester
as 6:2021cv00186
Petitioner:
Jerome Adam Hamilton
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Manchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
