Cases 11 - 20 of 524
Gerrans v. Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
as 3:2024cv00284
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
Petitioner:
Lawrence J. Gerrans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vazquez-Avendano v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00116
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Petitioner:
Omar Vazquez-Avendano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Adams
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Franke v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Camp
as 1:2024cv00336
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Camp
Petitioner:
Mark Franke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flores v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
as 5:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
Esteneslasio Luis Flores
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dobek v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 5:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Christopher Dobek
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mendoza v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00326
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Petitioner:
David Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mendez-Mendoza v. FCI-Victorville One
as 4:2024cv00700
Respondent:
FCI-Victorville One
Petitioner:
Alonso Mendez-Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sills v. Warden, Texarkana FCI
as 5:2024cv00107
Respondent:
Warden, Texarkana FCI
Petitioner:
Robert Sills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00303
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Petitioner:
Gerald Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
