Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Brian Perri v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 23-1451
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN A. PERRI
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Jonathan DaveyIn re: Jonathan Davey
as 23-1335
Petitioner:
In re: JONATHAN DAVEY
Respondent:
WARDEN LAMINE N'DIAYE, Fort Dix FCI and RENEE M. BUMB
Michael Gullinese v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 23-1218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GULLINESE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Rose v. Warden, Fort Dix FCI
as 1:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Lothario Dion Rose
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rose v. Warden, Fort Dix FCI
as 1:2023cv20222
Plaintiff:
Lothario Dion Rose
Defendant:
Warden, Fort Dix FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Timothy Defoggi v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 23-1085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY R. DEFOGGI
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Christopher Thieme v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 22-2498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER THIEME
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
WAYS v. CEO & OFFICE OF THE WARDEN et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv04943
Petitioner:
JOHN WAYS
Respondent:
CEO & OFFICE OF THE WARDEN Of JBMDL, NJ 08640 doing business as FORT DIX (FCI), JOSE CUEVAS, II and CUSTODIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nicholas Alvarez v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 22-2346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS ALVAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
SACKS v. CEO &/OR OFFICE OF THE WARDEN
as 1:2022cv04623
Petitioner:
JEFFREY SACKS
Respondent:
CEO &/OR OFFICE OF THE WARDEN Doing the day-to-day operations at State of New Jersey's federally leased incarceration institution doing business as JBMDL, NJ'S FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.