Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gonzales v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2019cv00276
Respondent:
242nd District Court of Hale County, Texas and Lubbock County Sheriff
Petitioner:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzales v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2019cv00277
Respondent:
NFN NLN and Lubbock County Sheriff
Petitioner:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzales v. Balderas et al
as 5:2019cv00275
Defendant:
Mrs. NFN Watson, Lubbock County Detention Center Administrators, Wally Hatch and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales et al v. City of Driscoll, Texas et al
as 2:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales and Diana Gonzales
Defendant:
City of Driscoll, Texas, Francisco Campos and Roberto Castenon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fred Gonzales v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10031
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRED GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Fred Gonzales v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10454
Petitioner / Appellant:
Fred Gonzales
Respondent / Appellee:
William Stephens, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Fred Gonzales v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10454
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRED GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gonzales v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00017
Petitioner:
Fred Gonzales
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzales v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00654
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gonzales v. Quarterman
as 2:2009cv00206
Petitioner:
Fred Gonzales
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
