Cases 11 - 20 of 25
ADVANSIX, INC. v. FAN
as 2:2017cv04332
Plaintiff:
ADVANSIX, INC.
Defendant:
PERRY FAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
WILLIAMS v. FANNING et al
as 3:2016cv05693
Plaintiff:
MACAULAY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ERIC FANNING and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. FAN FI INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04663
Plaintiff:
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
FAN FI INTERNATIONAL, INC. and ETL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. FAN FI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2016cv01244
Plaintiff:
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
FAN FI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. FAN FI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2016cv01142
Plaintiff:
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
FAN FI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
MICHAEL R. FANNING, et al v. PIPELINE ENERGY GROUP, INC.
as 2:2015mc00349
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING, et al
Defendant:
PIPELINE ENERGY GROUP, INC.
ALEJO v. SINGH et al
as 2:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
CARLOS L. ALEJO
Defendant:
PRAG B. SINGH, FAN HOLDINGS LLC, MARK K. LAUX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RICHMOND v. CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. et al
as 3:2013cv01957
Plaintiff:
SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
Defendant:
CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO.,LTD., INC., (CHIEN LUEN FLORIDA), (CHIEN LUEN CHINA) and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv07585
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
D'ELENA et al v. 21ST CENTURY SELF STORAGE et al
as 1:2012cv06373
Plaintiff:
ZENOVIA D'ELENA and JASMINE FANNING
Defendant:
21ST CENTURY SELF STORAGE and ABC CORP I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
