Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Elatab v. Foo and Foo LLC
as 1:2019cv11728
Plaintiff:
Jawad Elatab
Defendant:
Foo and Foo LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bastible et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11517
Plaintiff:
Stanley Greff, Jr., William Flaherty, Paul Fallon and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
United States of America v. Foo Yuan Food Products Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04689
Defendant:
Foo Yuan Food Products Company, Inc., Hsing Chuang, Susan Chuang and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Roman v. Lee et al
as 1:2017cv05995
Plaintiff:
Salvador Roman
Defendant:
Lee, Foo, John Doe Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chen et al v. 2425 Broadway Chao Restaurant, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv05735
Plaintiff:
Jianjun Chen , Qing Pu , Youchun Zheng and others
Defendant:
2425 Broadway Chao Restaurant, LLC, WMK 89th Street LLC, Tsu Yue Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carl v. Edwards et al
as 2:2016cv03863
Plaintiff:
Bernard Carl
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Richard Edwards, Foos China Trading and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hombordy v. Siegler et al
as 1:2016cv03279
Defendant:
Gwekcheng Foo and Andrew Siegler
Plaintiff:
Edward Hombordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
