Cases 11 - 20 of 348
SWONTEK v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
BRIAN SWONTEK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NUCAMENDI TRUJILLO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv04208
Petitioner:
JESUS ALBERTO NUCAMENDI TRUJILLO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KIM v. FORT LEE DENTAL GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
DR. JI YOON KIM
Defendant:
FORT LEE DENTAL GROUP, LLC and DR. GAHWA LEE
MCCOY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv04308
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCCOY
Defendant:
USA, USA BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORT DIX FCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MARTINEZ-GUZMAN v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv02156
Petitioner:
EDWIN MARTINEZ-GUZMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JIMENEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00773
Petitioner:
ELIEZER ALBERTO JIMENEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
NICOLESCU v. WARDEN FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
EMANUEL NICOLESCU
Respondent:
WARDEN FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROJAS v. FBOP et al
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ROJAS
Defendant:
FBOP, FCI FORT DIX WARDEN and DHS DEPARMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENDOZA v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv23215
Petitioner:
ALBERTO MENDOZA
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
