Cases 11 - 20 of 122
JAMARILLO-ROCHA v GILES et al
as 7:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
YURIDIA JAMARILLO-ROCHA
Defendant:
THOMAS P GILES, TAE JOHNSON, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
JAMARILLO-ROCHA v. MADRIGAL et al
as 5:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
YURIDIA JAMARILLO-ROCHA
Defendant:
Francisco Madrigal, Thomas P. Giles, Tae Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Ramos v. Obregon
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wendy Janeth Chavez Ramos
Defendant:
Eduardo Ismael Acosta Obregon and Luis Francisco Acosta Obregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
CAUDILLO, et al v ADVANCE SERVICES INC, et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Caudillo, Alexis Alejandro Caudillo, Cinthia Caudillo Pina and others
Defendant:
Advance Services, Inc., Corteva Agri-Science, Inc., Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Rivera v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv05184
Petitioner:
Francisco Castaneda Rivera
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00080
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Payne v. Francisco et al
as 1:2021cv04131
Plaintiff:
Eric Keith Payne
Defendant:
Dr. Francisco, Craig Owens, Nurse Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
ANTHONY v. BARBAALVAREZ et al
as 7:2020cv00191
Defendant:
JOHN DOE E &/OR F, J & N EXPRESS INCORPORATED, FRANCISCO J BARBAALVAREZ and others
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE A ANTHONY
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
