Cases 11 - 20 of 1,831
v. Simmons Bank et al
as 5:2024cv00321
Defendant:
Simmons Bank, Superior Ready Mix of Texas, LLC, Cinch Energy Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FTS Ranch, LLC et al v. Simmons Bank
as 5:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
FTS Ranch, LLC and Frank T. Jr. Shumate
Defendant:
Simmons Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wilson v. Atlantic Aviation FBO Holdings LLC
as 3:2024cv00718
Not Yet Classified:
Does 1-100
Plaintiff:
Captain Benjamin "Frank&quo Wilson
Defendant:
Atlantic Aviation FBO Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Bellard v. Frank Aguillera et al
as 4:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Reginald Whitfield Bellard
Defendant:
Frank Aguillera, Officer J. Tzaquitzal, Steven Castaneda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Walker et al
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
David Aaron Carr
Defendant:
Suzanne Walker, Martin Placke, Frank Malinak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Montemayor v. Parker
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Frank Montemayor
Defendant:
Stan Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 4:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
