Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Bowen v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01510
Plaintiff:
Mike Bowen
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Carly Duykaerts et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:18-CV-04567
Plaintiff:
Carly Duykaerts and Matthew Duykaerts
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Future Ford of Clovis and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Bowen v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAE/2:18-CV-01510
Plaintiff:
Bowen and Mike Bowen
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Clovis
Montano v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018at00497
Plaintiff:
Michelle Montano
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Montano v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAE/2:18-CV-00843
Plaintiff:
Montano and Michelle Montano
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Clovis
Montano v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv00843
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Clovis
Plaintiff:
Michelle Montano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
John Ayerle v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2017cv08752
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, DOES 1 through 10, inclsuive, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
John Ayerle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Marshall v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marshall and Beverly J. Marshall
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Decker Ford, Inc. a California corporation Doing business as Future Ford of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Taj Mahal Auto Group, LLC v. Mahindra & Mahindra, LTD
as 1:2012cv02048
Plaintiff:
Walker Motor Company, Beine Automotive of Southwest Missouri, LLC, Taj Mahal Auto Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
Mahindra & Mahindra, LTD. and Global Vehicles U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
