Cases 11 - 20 of 41
DuPree v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00541
Petitioner:
Durell T. DuPree
Respondent:
G. R. Johnson and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00413
Petitioner:
D'Andre Rogers
Respondent:
G. R. Johnson and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phlipot v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00383
Petitioner:
Matthew M. Phlipot
Respondent:
G. R. Johnson and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv01629
Petitioner:
Michael A. Jackson
Respondent:
G. R. Johnson and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rushing et al v. Apgar et al
as 1:2013cv01103
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rushing, Tevon Savage and Jamarr L. Campbell
Defendant:
James Apgar, G. R. Johnson and Sussex Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Delaware Family Court et al
as 1:2013cv00915
Petitioner:
David J. Buchanan
Respondent:
Delaware Family Court, Delaware Superior Court, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elwood Hunter v. G. R. Johnson, et al
as 13-2073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELWOOD HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
G. R. JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Detlef Hartmann v. G. R. Johnson
as 13-1954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETLEF F. HARTMANN
Defendant - Appellee:
G. R. JOHNSON, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Raymond Thornton v. West, et al
as 13-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST, MUSSER, LAURO B. DIAZ, JR. and others
Raymond Thornton v. Michael McMahon, et al
as 13-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCMAHON, PERRY PHELPS, G. R. JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
