Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Gore v. Eli Lilly & Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02539
Plaintiff:
Joyce Gore
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Inc. and Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goring et al v. Michael S. Neall & Associates, P.C.
as 8:2009cv03373
Plaintiff:
Richard Goring and Stephanie Tate-Goring
Defendant:
Michael S. Neall & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gore v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv01129
Plaintiff:
Zachary D. Gore
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Rosenmayer
as 1:2008cv01667
Plaintiff:
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Thomas Rosenmayer
Movant:
Coltec Industrial Products LLC, Coltec Industrial Products LLC, Coltec Industrial Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Rosenmayer
as 1:2008mc00160
Plaintiff:
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Thomas Rosenmayer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Rosenmayer
as 1:2008cv00862
Plaintiff:
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Thomas Rosenmayer
Cause Of Action: Diversity
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation
as 1:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
USA v. Agere Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
United States Of America, United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
Agere, Inc., Alcolac, Inc., Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
